I hate J. Michael Bailey. So much so that it even stopped me from pursuing this grad student I was hardcore cruising who I think was reciprocating it, but once I learned that she worshipped at the temple of Bailey (probably on her knees in his office, too, which I have no problem with in general, just with the fact that it's him), all interest went out the window. I always have disliked this "academic", even before I had concrete rational reasons. So I love it when I read articles that support my loathing.
( Bailey's recent 'scientific' book on trans women )
While I'm ranting, I also want to just throw one more comment in about the whole sodomy thing. I really understand that these laws are about selective enforcement and unfairly target queers, BUT I still am annoyed that it's being called "gay sex". I'm sick of specific activities being labelled as something that only gay people do or if you like doing them, you must be gay. Granted, Todd and Wendy are probably not going to get arrested in their bedroom when Wendy straps it on and gives it to Todd, but why not? I guess it's just how I think -- I'm less into the idea of mainstreaming deviants thereby perpetuating the ideas of what's norm, and more into the idea of bringing so-called normative folks over to the deviant side.
Also, I work for the people who litigated this case for the most part, so I have a very full understanding of the historical impact of this case and what it means and what doors are opened by this. But to me that's not mutually exclusive from my annoyance about other aspects. And I don't certainly begrudge anyone else their right to be happy about this supreme court decision.
And I can't believe Strom Thurmond is dead.
( Bailey's recent 'scientific' book on trans women )
While I'm ranting, I also want to just throw one more comment in about the whole sodomy thing. I really understand that these laws are about selective enforcement and unfairly target queers, BUT I still am annoyed that it's being called "gay sex". I'm sick of specific activities being labelled as something that only gay people do or if you like doing them, you must be gay. Granted, Todd and Wendy are probably not going to get arrested in their bedroom when Wendy straps it on and gives it to Todd, but why not? I guess it's just how I think -- I'm less into the idea of mainstreaming deviants thereby perpetuating the ideas of what's norm, and more into the idea of bringing so-called normative folks over to the deviant side.
Also, I work for the people who litigated this case for the most part, so I have a very full understanding of the historical impact of this case and what it means and what doors are opened by this. But to me that's not mutually exclusive from my annoyance about other aspects. And I don't certainly begrudge anyone else their right to be happy about this supreme court decision.
And I can't believe Strom Thurmond is dead.