![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
raybearToday I'm having this overwhelming feeling of "what's the big deal?" as in, something that has been on my heart and head for a few days has pretty much dissipated to a reasonable non-dramatic level. Probably because I got a lot off my chest last night. I also woke up with inspiration for an art project that I'm hoping to do this weekend.
I've had some interesting conversations at work and via phone this week which I'm summing up by taking it to the polls and finding out what my constituents think. I think my slanted language in the questions reveals what my personal opinion is. The general rule is that if your answer is "maybe" or "depends", than it's actually "no". Sort of like true/false questions -- if it's not wholly true at all times, it's false.
I wonder if your ballots had more fluffy questions like these if people would come out to vote on other political issues as well.
The title of this poll is supposed to be "Raybear's Propositions", but for some reason it got cut off.
[Poll #299768]
I've had some interesting conversations at work and via phone this week which I'm summing up by taking it to the polls and finding out what my constituents think. I think my slanted language in the questions reveals what my personal opinion is. The general rule is that if your answer is "maybe" or "depends", than it's actually "no". Sort of like true/false questions -- if it's not wholly true at all times, it's false.
I wonder if your ballots had more fluffy questions like these if people would come out to vote on other political issues as well.
The title of this poll is supposed to be "Raybear's Propositions", but for some reason it got cut off.
[Poll #299768]
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 11:33 am (UTC)#2- labels can be hard... because so many of them fit me in interlocking ways... but one label never truely encompasses everything... complicated.
#3- i have a problem with the grammatical portion of this. i wish there were an alternate personal identifier that was not gender-based. for people like me, i just go by whatever people want to refer to me as, unless i'm doing a certain "character" like Butch Chastity (f) or Chet Checkers (m).
#4- starbucks coffee is alright. they brew it extra strong. the science behind how they chose their blends/strengths are interesting. but i must say, i really love their espresso.