![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, what was the big deal with the movie Napoleon Dynamite?
It struck me as just a rip-off of a Wes Anderson film. Or better yet, if Rushmore and Superstar had a baby, it would be this movie, except not in a good way. How about, if DNA merged from Rushmore and Superstar was cloned and it didn't quite turn out right, it would be this movie. I don't think I hated it as much as
dommeyourass did (I laughed sveral times, I don't think she laughed at all). But there wasn't much redeeming about any character -- it lacked a certain poignancy I think the subject-matter needed. And a plot.
When I got obsessed with The Postal Service last summer, I downloaded everything I could find. And one of my favorite songs was Such Great Heights. And I downloaded what I thought was just an acoustic version of the song, but it turned out to be a cover by the darling band Iron & Wine. Ok, cool, I can dig it. In the past few weeks, there have been references to this song ALL over livejournal. And now I know why. Garden State came out on DVD.
Today, as part-two of the hipster double feature, we watched this movie. I was a little hesitant at first, in part because so many people around me loved it and it got built up. Especially after the experience with Napoleon Dynamite (save for
mintwaster and
cocolola, who I believe left the theater before it ended?) Anyway, yeah, the soundtrack is good, but this is because the soundtrack is every song I'm already listening to, so this is pretty neutral fact for me. It almost made me NOT like the movie, actually. I know, I'm weird about music, if by weird I mean picky, and I guess I just hate when film directors use songs in lieu of actual dialogue, scenes, acting. [e.g. most any use of Jeff Buckley's Hallelujah in any television show ever.] In my opinion, Zach Braff kind of hovered near that line, never crossing it, or at least not for too long, but I was still overly aware for the music at all times. It didn't seem to be built into the narrative as tightly as I like, but then again, first time director and this has a hint of a vanity project. The movie wasn't "a film for my generation" or whatever the tagline is, and at times I found it to be contrived.
But damn, if I wasn't crying like a baby at the end. Ok, ok, you got me. Despite the flaws I just laid into, it was pretty well acted and written.
So in the end, neither film completely lived up to the hype, but at least I didn't want my money back with one of them.
It struck me as just a rip-off of a Wes Anderson film. Or better yet, if Rushmore and Superstar had a baby, it would be this movie, except not in a good way. How about, if DNA merged from Rushmore and Superstar was cloned and it didn't quite turn out right, it would be this movie. I don't think I hated it as much as
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
When I got obsessed with The Postal Service last summer, I downloaded everything I could find. And one of my favorite songs was Such Great Heights. And I downloaded what I thought was just an acoustic version of the song, but it turned out to be a cover by the darling band Iron & Wine. Ok, cool, I can dig it. In the past few weeks, there have been references to this song ALL over livejournal. And now I know why. Garden State came out on DVD.
Today, as part-two of the hipster double feature, we watched this movie. I was a little hesitant at first, in part because so many people around me loved it and it got built up. Especially after the experience with Napoleon Dynamite (save for
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
But damn, if I wasn't crying like a baby at the end. Ok, ok, you got me. Despite the flaws I just laid into, it was pretty well acted and written.
So in the end, neither film completely lived up to the hype, but at least I didn't want my money back with one of them.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 01:42 pm (UTC)yeah, more subtlety indeed. it was like "how many freaky habits and quirks and comments can we pile onto one character?"
although...
Date: 2005-01-24 04:44 pm (UTC)Garden State
Date: 2005-01-24 01:40 pm (UTC)How can a film that one writes, directs AND stars in NOT be a vanity project? Ha! I still love it, though.
Re: Garden State
Date: 2005-01-24 01:44 pm (UTC)and yeah, like i said. crying. like a baby.
Re: Garden State
Date: 2005-01-24 01:52 pm (UTC)I know too much about this movie.
I know. I sobbed through the entire credits the first time I saw it. Didn't cry the 2nd and 3rd, sobbed the 4th. Hormonal? Who knows?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 01:50 pm (UTC)i haven't seen garden state yet, but yeah - the soundtrack has lots of good bands. iron and wine is one of my favourite bands, and i love their version of such great heights about ten million times more than the postal service one, which is fine but not as perfectly lovely.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 06:02 am (UTC)daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 02:07 pm (UTC)But more than anything, the film is an epic, magisterially observed pastiche on all-American geekhood, flooring the competition with a petulant shove. (from the villagevoice.com -
http://www.villagevoice.com/film/0423,atkinson,54121,20.html)
i loved the characters. each of them. yes. quirky. to the core. and solid. by no means am i saying this movie is an epic classic, but it's really really smart. gorgeously photographed. subtle in this way that beats you over the head in its hugeness, but yet quietly subdued in the same way (those neverending landscapes that dwarf the people and community, for example). i love the triumph of the geek. the unfounded yet found confidence of napoleon (he's gonna rule the world and gonna have babes real or imagined at his side always, AND he's a brilliant artist if only of the LIGER). i could go on. but i think have taken up quite enough space.
long live napolEON!
Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 02:20 pm (UTC)"It's a simple collection of sight gags and pratfalls that mines the overly familiar turf of awkward adolescence without bringing anything truly original to the experience."
-- Kevin Crust, LOS ANGELES TIMES
i will agree that it was cinematically gorgeous, actually, with the idaho landscape and scenes.
i did have a moment while watching what it would be like if i watched with someone like you, who loved and was cracking up at it. i still probably would have found it overblown and underwhelming in the end, but the experience might have been better.
Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 02:22 pm (UTC)but yeah. i am often very forgiving of movies that make me swoon visually. such lush color schemes. and we all know what a hopeless color addict i am. ooooh weeeeee.
Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 02:26 pm (UTC)excuse me...
Date: 2005-01-24 04:50 pm (UTC)Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 04:39 pm (UTC)Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 08:00 pm (UTC)Re: daaaaaaaang.
Date: 2005-01-24 08:37 pm (UTC)oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-24 02:12 pm (UTC)i will give this criticism (which nearly everyone i know has given): the ending totally sucked. had it ended five minutes earlier, it would've been a much much better film.
Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-24 02:16 pm (UTC)and i guess i'm always going to cringe at the phrase "for our generation" because when applied in the moment by the people who made it, it's pretentious. and when applied after the fact, it's presumptuous that an entire generation can be reduced to one type of experience (and it's usually the middle class white one at that).
Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-24 02:19 pm (UTC)ok, but that IS his generation (he's middle class white guy). and i have to applaud him for not trying to represent someone else's experience. so yeah, i guess it might be a matter of semantics. maybe they should have branded it "a film for zach braff's generation" or something.
Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-24 02:23 pm (UTC)i need to put the equivalent of a livejournal post-it note on this, because i have so many thoughts around this issue lately.
Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-24 04:41 pm (UTC)Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-25 06:08 am (UTC)Re: oh, and...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:14 pm (UTC)I'm glad someone else hated it
Date: 2005-01-24 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 05:31 pm (UTC)I fucking hate that so much I can't even tell you.
And I don't even LIKE that song so much!
It's just so fucking...facile...to use that song. It's like when in movie commercials they play recent hits, that aren't actually in the movie or on the soundtrack, to pull in the teenage suckers.
In that same way, using Buckley is like a short-hand for "look how cool we are, we want to move you with something hip that only you music nerds will know,cause your cool, just like us!"
Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-24 07:28 pm (UTC)I want my money and your money back for both of them.
Other songs to add to Hallelujah: Cannonball by Damien Rice, The Blower's Daughter by Damien Rice, Volcano by Damien Rice, Cold Water by Damien Rice....