I know this is going to make me sound like the most curmudgeonly, crotchety grandpa that I sometimes am (though I'm much more often a friendly, Werther's original-giving, cheese-carving and seersucker-wearing old man), but I have to let it out:
These new-fangled crosswords are relying too much on obscure wikipedia-type words to make their puzzles work.
Of course, I know this because I'm constantly GOING to wikipedia to check my work (or occasionally just straight up cheat when its late and I'm tired) and the phrase in the clue is practically verbatim from the entry. Ben Tausig, stop the madness.
Though this specific puzzle I'm doing does include one of my favorite words: quetzalcoatl.
< / obscure crossword related ranting >
These new-fangled crosswords are relying too much on obscure wikipedia-type words to make their puzzles work.
Of course, I know this because I'm constantly GOING to wikipedia to check my work (or occasionally just straight up cheat when its late and I'm tired) and the phrase in the clue is practically verbatim from the entry. Ben Tausig, stop the madness.
Though this specific puzzle I'm doing does include one of my favorite words: quetzalcoatl.
< / obscure crossword related ranting >
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 12:39 pm (UTC)I stopped working on the puzzle in Trip Payne's book because of all the obscure words he uses. I'm also keeping track of them, for what purpose, I don't know.
Ben Tausig's not so bad about obscure words (I mean Trip Payne is like 2-3 obscure words per puzzle every other puzzle), what really makes my inner grandpa come out is the fact that I need to have knowledge of !!! or Arcade Fire album names to do his crosswords.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 12:55 pm (UTC)My personal rule is that you shouldn't have your obscure words cross each other, because it seems like the person who created the puzzle stuck themselves in a corner and did some googling to come up with obscure words to fix the problem. This is unfair and lazy puzzling.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-20 12:47 pm (UTC)hassock and rake
Date: 2007-07-19 11:51 pm (UTC)