raybear: (Spike)
[personal profile] raybear
My horoscope this morning said:
You may be overly concerned about your own happiness or about the safety of someone that you love. If you feel your emotions are too heavy, you need to remember to breathe.

I don't like that phrase "safety of someone you love". I do like the word "overly", because that implies it's less a reality and more of just a fear. Or at least one hopes.

Also on the astrological front, the moon moved into Cancer overnight and a full moon approaches, which normally would worry me a bit about my state of mind, but I'm just so damn pleased that Mercury is moving forward again that I don't care. When Mercury is retrograde, my communication problems aren't too external -- there's the occasional slow e-mail or cell phone on the fritz, but most of my difficulty is internal. It's like the neural pathways between my heart and my brain get crossed and reversed and I can't figure out what the hell I'm feeling or thinking and then I might say the opposite anyway. Mercury retrograde periods are often marked with instances of me thinking: "I really need to be social right now" but then I realize in the middle of it, oh wait, no I needed alone time. And vice versa.

Other than my mentor, I haven't spoken with anyone who's actually read ALL of Jonathan Franzen's The Corrections. I know a few people who started it, loved it initially, but then got bogged down by its relentless nature in chronicling the anxious self-sabotaging inner workings of what I believe is a remarkably common family. I am, apparently, a masochist. I can't stop reading about them. For a couple reasons, most importantly that it's a school assignment so I'm not just reading it voluntarily. Also, I'm reading with more of an eye as a writer, as in what can I learn about his choices and techiniques, rather than reading it as purely a voyage of entertainment or art. But perhaps the biggest compulsion is I trust him. I really do. I don't know why I trust Franzen so strongly but I can't help but think it's going to have intense resolution and I'm desperate to know where he's going to take me. I know I'm possibly be set up to be burned and then I will never trust him again as a writer, but that's okay too. A learning experience.

I think about the concept of "trust" a lot when it comes to movies and directors. I will go see movies with plotlines that seem boring and actors I hate, but if I know and love and trust the director, I'll often end up enjoying myself. I value directors who understand the importance of an audience, of not insulting the viewer's intelligence but also not overstepping the boundaries without guidance. I'm giving you my time, I'm suspending my disbelief, so don't disappoint me, don't take me for granted. Show me something new and scary and startling and strange, but don't do it at the expense of giving up on humanity. Don't fuck with me just to fuck with me -- do it with a purpose.

So we'll see, Mr. Franzen. I have about 250 pages to go before the weekend.

IN G*D WE TRUST

Date: 2004-01-06 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bowdownza.livejournal.com
I had the same problem reading A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. Just dropped it halfway through. Although I really did have a problem reading something that was marketed as the voice of my generation, I mean I have no problem drinking Pepsi as the choice of my generation but that book was just to winky tounge in cheek cutsey for my taste.
As for Mr. Franzen keep reading. I too, got bored and put it down and unconsciously picked it up again for the flight home for thanksgiving last year. In the end, I thought it was a great book and I appreciated that yes he (franzen) is kind of a prick and full of himself and prone to commments about saving modern literature. But it is, I think, an interesting and technichnicaly good book about a topic (family) which is not easy as opposed to say writing about a specific story say a murder mystery.
As for directors I used to think the same thing until I sat through all ten or fifteen hours of Eyes Wide Shut cause I thought this is Stanley Kubrick and is going to go somewhere really good. It did not.

Kubrickian voice of a new cola

Date: 2004-01-06 10:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raybear.livejournal.com
I've barely started Eggers book, even though I was all excited when it came out and saw him read and bought the hardcover and had him personally sign it. Then I went home and put it on a bookshelf. Then two weeks later his smug face was everywhere and he was the next big thing and I just got bored before I started. You might like Franzen more if you check out his book of essays 'How To Be Alone' which includes his infamous "Harper's essay" where he condemns mondern literature and the industry, but in the introduction he talks about how he cringes re-rereading it now and how full of himself he is/was but wanted to resist the temptation to edit as a reminder. I admired that.

When I saw Eyes Wide Shut, I knew immediately that when Kubrick died, Tom Cruise took over as director/editor and made the whole horrible boring narcissistic movie about him him him. I can't belive Stanley would hurt me that way. Because man, when someone making movies I love burns me, it's supremely hard for me to ever go back to them. Ever.

DIET SPRITE WIDE SHUT

Date: 2004-01-06 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bowdownza.livejournal.com
I had heard something about how when Stanley died he left this giant mess of a movie and the studio was freaked at what to do. I had not heard that Tom Cruise was the one to edit the mess. Is that really true?
The movie was the unsexiest thing I have ever seen.
Thanks for reminding me about the essay book.
I don't know why he cringes I mean I can appreciate an prick if they are good at what they do.

Cruise Control

Date: 2004-01-06 10:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raybear.livejournal.com
I haven't actually read anywhere that Tom Cruise ruined/edited the movie but I know deep in my heart it is THE TRUTH. I mean, his sorry no-talent smirking face was in *every* scene.

Date: 2004-01-06 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magdalene1.livejournal.com
I've read all of the Corrections. It was ok.

Date: 2004-01-06 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mellowdramamama.livejournal.com
If you like "The Corrections" try reading his collection of essays "How to be Alone". I love, love, loved it and yes he is a pretentious prick but he. is. brilliant.

Date: 2004-01-06 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] limenal.livejournal.com
Caitlin read it. She loved it and told me to read it.

Date: 2004-01-06 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raybear.livejournal.com
Actually, I was just thinking last night about getting you a copy to read. I thought you'd appreciate the style and the subject, but also because a good portion of the book is taking place in Philadelphia, particularly Chestnutt Hill (I think?).

retrograde is hip again

Date: 2004-01-07 05:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torreycanyon.livejournal.com
In the last burst of fiction-reading before this one, I remember enjoying The Corrections. I did wonder where it was going, if anywhere, but had no trouble in finishing it. If I like the beginning, it has to turn truly dreary for me to not keep on reading.

It was the start of the pseudo book club I have with my mum. Unlike me she buys fiction, so has plenty to pass on. We don't discuss the books though. Just read.

May 2010

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 05:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios